Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Zorbaci et al v. Montauk Bulk Carriers Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09359
Plaintiff:
Erdi Zorbaci, Kazim Kilinc and Harun Rodos
Defendant:
Montauk Bulk Carriers Inc., Ustun Kocal and Mutlu Kocal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Oyenuga v. Sowore et al
as 4:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Kazim Oladotun Oyenuga
Defendant:
Omoyele Sowore, Saharareporters.com, Sahara Reporters Media Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cruz v. US
as 23-1347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee:
BATOOL KAZIM, GORHAM and UNITED STATES
USA v. Sylvester Andrews
as 22-2826
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SYLVESTER ANDREWS, also known as KAZIME
Heist v. Kapushev et al
as 4:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heist
Defendant:
Kazim Kapushev, Russo Brothers Transportation Inc and Pyramid Moving LLC doing business as Longhorn Cargo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Melissa Hanus et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04985
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hanus, Brittany Harper, Glen Kennedy and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hanus et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00771
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hanus, Brittany Harper, Glen Kennedy and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hanus et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00771
Plaintiff:
Hanus, Melissa Hanus, Brittany Harper and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
