Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bennett et al v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Tim Bennett, Overtime Sports Management Biloxi, LLC and Timothy Bennett
Defendant:
Kenneth J Young, Biloxi Baseball, LLC dba Biloxi Shuckers, KY Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bennett v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Tim Bennett
Defendant:
Ken Young and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bennett v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Tim Bennett
Defendant:
Ken Young and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Latorey Greene, Sr. v. Ken Young
as 19-7877
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN MAYES, Solicitor, KELLY JACKSON, KEN YOUNG, Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATOREY J. GREENE, SR.
Greene v. Young et al
as 3:2019cv03312
Defendant:
Patrick Wright, Ken Young, Jr., Casey Dale Cornwell and others
Plaintiff:
Latorey J. Greene, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Young et al
as 3:2019cv02175
Plaintiff:
Latorey Greene and Latorey J. Greene
Defendant:
Patrick Wright, Ken Young, Casey Dale Cornwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slee et al v. Woodhull Township et al
as 2:2017cv12103
Plaintiff:
Pamela Slee and David Slee
Defendant:
Woodhull Township , Diana Hasse , Kay Nickols and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gee v. Indiana Department Of Correction et al
as 3:2015cv00452
Plaintiff:
Nykaza Gee
Defendant:
Indiana Department Of Correction, Eric Parrish, Ken Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
