Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Kenneth Jackson v. USA
as 13-6262
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH WADE JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Holizna et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv06173
Plaintiff:
Laura Ann Holizna and Kenneth Wade Holizna
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Proxy Biomedical, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holizna et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
Laura Ann Holizna and Kenneth Wade Holizna
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Proxy Biomedical, Inc. and Proxy Biomedical, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21217
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wade Cox and Marcela Ray Cox
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv02242
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wade Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Quadri et al v. Randock et al
as 2:2010cv13910
Plaintiff:
T Quadri, B S Alli, Ben Alli and others
Defendant:
Dixie Ellen Randock, Steven Randock, Richard John Novak and others
Carter et al v. KVAT Food Stores, Inc.
as 6:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
Helen Craig Carter and Kenneth Wade Carter
Defendant:
KVAT Food Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lynch v. President of the U.S. Obama
as 7:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wade Lynch
Defendant:
President of the U.S. Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. Walmart
as 7:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wade Lynch
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. Direct Express
as 7:2009cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wade Lynch
Defendant:
Direct Express
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
