Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Magee v. Pike County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kentrail Jamal Magee
Defendant:
Pike County, Mississippi, James Brumfield, Richard Bynam and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25817
Plaintiff:
KENTRAILL STOKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Freeney v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Dondi Kentrail Freeney
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Greenlaw et al
as 6:2022cv06121
Plaintiff:
Corey Kentraile Jones
Defendant:
Shelia R Greenlaw, Everett G Litzsey, Jr, CPT. Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Greenlaw et al
as 4:2022cv01122
Plaintiff:
Corey Kentraile Jones
Defendant:
Shelia R Greenlaw, Everett G Litzsey, Jr, Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kentrail Brown
as 22-12945
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENTRAIL BROWN
Corion Babers v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-16959
Petitioner / Appellant:
CORION KENTRAIL BABERS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Gaines v. US Treasury Department et al
as 5:2021cv00187
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and US Treasury Department
Plaintiff:
Montavis Kentrail Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babers v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00308
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Corion Kentrail Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Dondi Freeney
as 19-13918
Defendant / Appellant:
DONDI KENTRAIL FREENEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
