Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ryan et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW VAN AUKEN, PATRICIA D. CASAZZA, LORIE VAN AUKEN and others
Defendant:
National Iranian Gas Company, Iran Airlines, National Iranian Oil Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Pineda et al v. Department of Children and Families
as 1:2016cv12229
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Virginia Chan, Kerry Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Pineda and Alba Pineda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ryan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09700
Plaintiff:
Laura Ryan
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Texas Div, Sons of Confdr Vet, et al v. Victor Vandergriff, et al
as 13-50411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEXAS DIVISION, SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation, GRANVEL J. BLOCK, Individually and RAY W. JAMES, Individually
Defendant - Appellee:
VICTOR T. VANDERGRIFF, In His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Board, CLIFFORD BUTLER, In His Official Capacity as a Member of the Board, RAYMOND PALACIOS, In His Official Capacity as a Member of the Board and others
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. et al v. Victor T. Vandergriff et al
as 1:2011cv01049
Plaintiff:
Granvel J. Block, Ray W James and Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc.
Defendant:
Clifford Butler, Blake Ingram, Cheryl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham et al v. JPMorgan Chase et al
as 3:2009cv03959
Plaintiff:
Jeff Graham and Kimberlie Graham
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase, JPMorgan Chase, JPMorgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
