Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jacquelyn M. Rolland et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2026cv07830
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn M. Rolland and Ja-quren Lydell Naulls
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Capt. B. Tolmasoff, Sgt. Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mercy Schelmety v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2026cv01915
Plaintiff:
Mercy Schelmety
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Jim Wilbur, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hall v. Huerta et al
as 5:2026cv06730
Plaintiff:
Jasmen Lavar Hall
Defendant:
R. Huerta, K. Rodriguez, A. Souza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Eliot LeBow LCSW, CDCES v. Multiplan, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv06285
Plaintiff:
Eliot LeBow LCSW, CDCES
Defendant:
Multiplan, Inc., Aetna, Inc., The Cigna Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Lee v. Mayfield et al
as 1:2026cv02256
Plaintiff:
Frederick Donnell Lee
Defendant:
Cedra Mayfield, Real Broker, LLC, Rebekah Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Johnson v. Gagne
as 26-1044
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
GERARD G. GAGNE, Psychiatrist, THOMAS KOCIENDA, Chief Psychologist, LALITHA PIERI, Supervisory Psychologist and others
Stephenson v. Beth Barta LCSW CAC III LLC
as 1:2026cv01670
Plaintiff:
Alicia Stephenson
Defendant:
Beth Barta LCSW CAC III LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Gagne
as 26-615
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
GERARD G. GAGNE, Psychiatrist, THOMAS KOCIENDA, Chief Psychologist, LALITHA PIERI, Supervisory Psychologist and others
Toccara Puller v. Maggie Marshall
as 26-6253
Plaintiff:
TOCCARA YVONNE PULLER
Defendant:
MAGGIE MARSHALL, DENISE ZELAYA, WILLIAM TURNER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
