Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Riley v. Lear Corporation
as 2:2026cv00593
Plaintiff:
John Riley
Defendant:
Lear Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith et al v. Melvin et al
as 3:2026cv00220
Plaintiff:
Eric D Smith and Star E Lear
Defendant:
Matthew R Melvin and Champaign Countywide Public Safety Communications Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Jackson v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 3:2026cv00740
Plaintiff:
Joshua Casmir Jackson and Joshua Jackson
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Frazier, Peoples and others
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lear v. Salt Lake City Police et al
as 2:2026cv00483
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Lear and Nicholas Joseph Lear
Defendant:
Salt Lake City Police and Premier Security
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borrenpohl v. Robert et al
as 2:2026cv00301
Defendant:
Brent Regan, Paul John Trouette, Christofer I. Berg and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Snyder Borrenphol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Taylor v. Lear Corporation
as 4:2026cv00685
Plaintiff:
Enrico Taylor
Defendant:
Lear Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mason Hazen v. Trey Lear, et al
as 26-11547
Plaintiff:
MASON R. HAZEN
Defendant:
TREY D. LEAR, BLAKE GRUNY, BRADLEY M. COMBS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
