Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LERCH v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
JENA LERCH
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
LERCH v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
as 5:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
JENA LERCH
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Terrell Dismukes v. Kyle Lerch
as 23-1789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRELL DISMUKES
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE LERCH
STRATTON v. CITY OF KANNAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
KATHY STRATTON
Defendant:
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, J. M. LIVENGOOD, M. T. HOEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lerche v. Lewis et al
as 3:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Richard Lerche
Defendant:
Byron Lewis, City of New Roads and Rene Thibodeaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Stuart et al
as 6:2022cv06336
Plaintiff:
Marquis Williams
Defendant:
C.O. J. Stuart, C.O. J. Brayette, C.O. J. Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lerch Bates, Inc. v. Alvin
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Lerch Bates, Inc.
Defendant:
Lloyd Alvin and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Abrams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00027
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Abrams, Stanley Albansky, Joseph Alosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
