Cases 1 - 10 of 12
In re: Randy Brackins El
as 26-10607
Petitioner:
In re: RANDY BRACKINS EL
Respondent:
LISA BATES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Brackins El v. Bates et al
as 5:2026cv00256
Plaintiff:
Randy Brackins El
Defendant:
Lisa Bates, Pamela Bondi, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El v. Bates et al
as 5:2026cv00205
Plaintiff:
Randy Brackins El
Defendant:
Lisa Bates, United States Attorney General, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brackins El v. Bates et al
as 5:2026cv00167
Plaintiff:
Randy Brackins El
Defendant:
Lisa Bates, Pamela Bondi, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bates et al v. American Optical Corporation et al
as 7:2022cv00034
Defendant:
Cabot CSC LLC, American Optical Corporation, Cabot Safety Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Bates, Lisa Bates, Shannon Hurley-Hibbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BATES et al v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 3:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BATES and LISA BATES
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATES et al v. MTD PRODUCTS, INC.
as 3:2012cv00146
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BATES and LISA BATES
Defendant:
MTD PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
