Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kareem Bey v. Divya Sarang, et al
as 26-3291
Defendant:
PRAIRIE LOCK, LLC, UNKNOWN, DAVID R. GRAY, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
KAREEM S. BEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02522
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Locke v. Wilson et al
as 5:2026cv02957
Plaintiff:
Matthew L Locke
Defendant:
Cade Wilson and Able Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Festekjian v. Locke
as 4:2026cv01626
Plaintiff:
Armen Festekjian
Defendant:
Giles Car Locke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Skeen v. Stenberg, et al.
as 2:2026cv00075
Defendant:
Icy Plays LLC doing business as Icy Sports Plays, Sizzling Selections LLC, Zapped LLC doing business as Zapped Bets and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Russell Skeen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Johnson et al v. Byrna Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2026cv14538
Plaintiff:
Lock-N-Load Non-Lethal Defense, Lorie Johnson, Larry Johnson and others
Defendant:
Byrna Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Abilov et al v. KIA AMERICA, INC et al
as 8:2026cv02914
Plaintiff:
Vasif Abilov, Jeffrey Allbritton, Ashley Arriaga and others
Defendant:
KIA AMERICA, INC and Hyundai Motor Amercia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Locke v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv00212
Plaintiff:
Talmadge Locke
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation formerly doing business as FEDEX Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
