Cases 1 - 10 of 657
Lockett et al v. Jenkins Correctional Center
as 6:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lockett and Carlos White
Defendant:
Jenkins Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. Matteson
as 5:2024cv02189
Petitioner:
Jamie Lockett
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary Carter, Jr. v. Effingham County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-10842
Plaintiff:
GARY ANTHONY CARTER, JR.
Defendant:
EFFINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WINSTON MOCK, WELLPATH and others
Lockett v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Lt. Ngduea, Sgt. Slayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOCKETT
Defendant:
A. HARMON, GRAY, B. LUNSFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitch v. Garland
as 24-40017
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Official capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Christopher Wray, Official Capacity as Director of F.B.I., Michael Carvajal, Official Capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Lockett v. Luo et al
as 1:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lockett
Defendant:
Luo and Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene Johnson v. Ramsey County ADC, et al
as 23-3534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Laron Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Ramsey County Adult Detention Center, Thaddeus Lockett, Shaun Del Rosario and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05338
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Benn et al v. Kajy et al
as 2:2023cv12586
Plaintiff:
Anthony Benn, Jr., Calvin Griffin, Kendelle Johnson and others
Defendant:
J. Kajy, Oakland County Jail, Hatchet and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
