Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,488
Lamar v. Seamster et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: Anthony D Lamar
Defendant: Lonnell Oquin Seamster, Sr, Laconya Harris and Aundrea Culclager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaynes v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff: Troy Lamar Jaynes
Defendant: Quiros, John Doe, Lavetta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ADAMS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner: MARCUS LAMAR BROWN
Respondent: ROBERT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelnutt v. McLaughlin et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff: Keneth Kaylon Shelnutt
Defendant: Josh McLaughlin, Brady Aderholt, Gray West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brent Jacoby v. John Hamm, et al
as 24-10574
Plaintiff: BRENT JACOBY
Defendant: COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN Q. HAMM, EASTERLING CF WARDEN and others
Giles v. Jane Does 1-2
as 6:2024cv00370
Plaintiff: Antonio Lamar Giles
Defendant: Jane Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Wilburn v. Macomber We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00500
Petitioner: Terrence Lamar Wilburn
Respondent: Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobbs v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00029
Petitioner: Kasper Lamar Dobbs
Respondent: Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WOODS v. COPELAND et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: LAMAR WOODS
Defendant: ASHLEE COPELAND, W SUMMERS and MATTHEW J TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00736
Plaintiff: Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant: Ted Jackson, Officer Jones and Officer Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?