Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jordan v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03086
Plaintiff:
Valdez Lamont Jordan
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell, Christal Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv02654
Plaintiff:
Valdez Lamont Jordan
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Jeremiah Brown, David Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv03041
Plaintiff:
Valdez Lamont Jordan
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Lori Cunningham, Chad Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Darence Jordan
as 21-10219
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DARENCE LAMONT JORDAN, AKA D
Damar Jordan v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 20-2227
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMAR LAMONT JORDAN
JORDAN v. TICE et al
as 1:2018cv00384
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
DAMAR LAMONT JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Pulaski County Detention Facility et al
as 4:2018cv00879
Defendant:
Pulaski County Detention Facility, Does Intake Nurses and Johnson
Plaintiff:
Oliver Lamont Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jordan v. Haggard et al
as 2:2018cv01907
Defendant:
Julia Morgan and Lori Haggard
Plaintiff:
Darence Lamont Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Middleton et al
as 4:2017cv00510
Plaintiff:
Oliver Lamont Jordan
Defendant:
Brandon Middleton and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
T.R. et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02015
Plaintiff:
T.R. , Darius Byrd , Codi Rowe and others
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company , Janssen Research & Development LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
