Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LANDY v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv11950
Plaintiff: RONALD LANDY
Defendant: FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09837
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yarbrough v. Limestone County Sheriff Office
as 5:2026cv01368
Petitioner: Jerry Landis Yarbrough
Respondent: Limestone County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In re: Darryl Simon
as 26-1999
Petitioner: In re: DARRYL LANDIS SIMON
Jackson v. Retzlaff et al
as 2:2026cv01312
Plaintiff: Littleton Emmett Jackson and Littleton Jackson
Defendant: Sgt Retzlaff, Lt Landy, Van de Veld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dari v. Chan et al
as 1:2026cv04483
Plaintiff: Nadine Dari
Defendant: Wing F Chan, Anthony Sica, Joseph Antonio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00244
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02194
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
CALASCIONE v. LANDI, JR.
as 3:2026cv07927
Plaintiff: ANTHONY R. CALASCIONE
Defendant: AUGUST J. LANDI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2026cv04187
Plaintiff: STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant: PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION, PANASONIC LIFE SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT. LTD. d/b/a ANCHOR BY PANASONIC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?