Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. City of Moore, et al
as 26-6103
Plaintiff:
ALLAHGEHOVAH JONES
Defendant:
CITY OF MOORE, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, TODD GIBSON, Police Chief and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv02350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Landrum et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2026cv02479
Plaintiff:
Donald William Landrum and Rachel Landrum
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Garcia et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03574
Plaintiff:
Omar E. Garcia, Andrea Aloria, Benjamin Diaz and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bevirt v. US
as 26-1703
Plaintiff:
TYSON LEE BEVIRT, TINA DIANE BRITT, RONALD LEE KOBOS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Landrum v. Rutledge et al
as 1:2026cv02802
Plaintiff:
Terry Landrum
Defendant:
Kim Rutledge, Andrew Imparato, Brian Winic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rebecca Love, et al v. Red River Talc LLC, et al
as 26-1448
Plaintiff:
REBECCA LOVE, D.D.S., SHARON MURPHY, WILLIAM A. HENRY and others
Defendant:
RED RIVER TALC LLC, FKA LTL Management LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO NA INC, HoldCo 0101059288 and others
Amicus Curiae:
DAVID R. KUNEY, Esq.
Landrum v. United States of America
as 4:2026cv00201
Plaintiff:
Charles Landrum
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
