Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Langley v. Miller et al
as 4:2023cv05112
Plaintiff:
Donna Langley
Defendant:
Don Miller and James Kiddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Sharon Acosta et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05061
Plaintiff:
Sharon Acosta, Baron Allen, Andrew Anderer and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Acosta et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Sharon Acosta, Baron Allen, Andrew Anderer and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Merkle v Gragg, et al
as 5:2019cv00640
Plaintiff:
Carl N. Merkle, Carl Nathan Merkle and Carl Nathaniel Merkle
Defendant:
Langley and Banack, Incorporated, Bradley M. Gordon, Kevin F. Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Langley v. H.W. Pirkey Power Plant et al
as 2:2018cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jason Langley
Defendant:
H.W. Pirkey Power Plant , American Electric Power Company, Inc. , AEP Texas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Langley v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00713
Plaintiff:
Regina Langley
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Langley v. Trusted Moving and Storage, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 3:2012cv00466
Plaintiff:
Russel Langley and Lise Langley
Defendant:
Trusted Moving and Storage, Inc. and Amanda Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potter v. Langley
as 1:2011cv01067
Defendant:
Tony Best, Helen Mae Keating Poynor, OAP (Langley) and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Potter v. Langley
as 3:2011cv02783
Plaintiff:
Kevin Potter
Defendant:
Jerry Langley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Langley et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2011cv00774
Defendant:
Shirley E. Jones and Charlee A. Phillips, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Ivan B. Langley and Karlee E. Langley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
