Cases 11 - 20 of 185
Jones v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Kathleen Allison, Kristin Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cory France v. John Doe Doctor
as 22-7310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORY EUGENE FRANCE, a/k/a Clorey Eugene France
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE DOCTORS, DIANE BROWNING, DONALD MICKLOS and others
JONES v. STATE OF MISSOURI et al
as 1:2022cv01238
Petitioner:
BOBBY LARRY JONES
Respondent:
STATE OF MISSOURI and DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buchanan v. Maye et al
as 2:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buchanan
Defendant:
Bobby Maye, Jonnie Jones, Larry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Smith
as 2:2021cv00242
Petitioner:
Larry Jones
Respondent:
Aimee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64341
Plaintiff:
LARRY JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pratt et al v. KSE Sportsman Media, Inc.
as 1:2021cv11404
Defendant:
Outdoor Sportsman Group, Inc. and KSE Sportsman Media, Inc. d/b/a Outdoor Sportsman Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones and Richard Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jones v. Brownlow et al
as 2:2021cv02091
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Jones, Arkansas State Troop J and Deputy Christopher Brownlow
Plaintiff:
Travis Wayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Detroit et al
as 4:2021cv10441
Plaintiff:
D'Shawn Jones and Larry Jones
Defendant:
James Demps, City of Detroit, Paul Sweppy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05791
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
