Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Hollon v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2026cv02158
Plaintiff:
Steven Hollon
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Public Defender's Office, Sacramento County Conflict Criminal Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Mobile Police Department et al
as 1:2026cv00218
Plaintiff:
Monica F. Taylor
Defendant:
City of Mobile Police Department, Bradley Latham, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jefferson v. Barrick, et al.
as 26-3751
Petitioner:
AYANA JEFFERSON
Respondent:
ANTONIO BARRICK, NICHOLAS PETSAS, LISA HAFEN and others
H. Gurvey, et alIn re: H. Gurvey, et al
as 26-2031
Petitioner:
In re: H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. GURVEY
Respondent:
M&T BANK INC, a NY Banking Corporation, SCHILLER KNAPP LEFKOWITZ & HERTZEL LLP, HONORABLE GLENN GRANT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Allah v. Walters et al
as 7:2026cv00405
Plaintiff:
Asiatic Royalprince Allah and Vernon L. Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph W. Walters, Steve Herrick, Jeffrey Dillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Latham v. Lyman
as 26-1528
Plaintiff:
LINCOLN GOEFFREY LATHAM, JR., Applicant for SNAP Benefits in DTA Connect App
Defendant:
MAUREEN LYMAN, Cash Manager at Department of Transitional Assistance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
