Cases 1 - 10 of 1,026
Blum et al v. Heller, Esq et al
as 1:2024cv03130
Plaintiff:
Wendy A. Blum and Ilene G. Fattore
Defendant:
David L. Heller, Esq, Peter M. Mott, Esq. and Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Blum et al v. Heller, Esq et al
as 2:2024cv03130
Plaintiff:
Wendy A. Blum and Ilene G. Fattore
Defendant:
David L. Heller, Esq, Peter M. Mott, Esq. and Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Latham Pool Products, Inc. v. Sentry Covers, LLC
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Latham Pool Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Sentry Covers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1331 Patent Infringement
Ratliff v. Latham et al
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Semaj Ratliff
Defendant:
Latham, Mendoza, Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. Avenue East Apartments LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Charlene Y Latham
Defendant:
Avenue East Apartments LLC doing business as Alight-Stillwater, SCION Group LLC The, Phillips Murrah PC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Latham v. Stearns
as 24-1307
Plaintiff:
LINCOLN LATHAM, JR.
Defendant:
RICHARD G. STEARNS, Honorable
Tony Forrester v. Officer Kemp
as 24-1276
Plaintiff:
TONY GENE FORRESTER
Defendant:
OFFICER KEMP, VICTORIA ANN LATHAM and ANDREA MITCHELL
Johnson v. Latham et al
as 1:2024cv02673
Plaintiff:
Charles Levon Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Latham, Sgt. Mendoza, C/O Bernal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Lindy Latham
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Latham v. Johnson
as 1:2024cv10591
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Lauren Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
