Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Cain v. Starks et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lee Starks, John Doe, Ofc David Killop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks, Jr. v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lee Starks, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kevin McCoy, A. Wethington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02838
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
In re: Kendell Starks
as 22-11426
Petitioner:
In re: KENDELL LEE STARKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Starke v. Weatherly et al
as 5:2022ct03104
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Starke
Defendant:
Jane Weatherly, District Attorney, SCRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00545
Petitioner:
Kendall Lee Starks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Starks, Jr. v. Unknown
as 2:2019cv00470
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lee Starks, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STARK v. RUTHEFORD et al
as 4:2018cv00056
Defendant:
3 UNNAMED CONSERVATION OFFICERS, ROBERT BREWINGTON and MICK RUTHEFORD
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE STARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kendell Starks v. USA
as 18-11204
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENDELL LEE STARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
