Cases 1 - 10 of 228
White v. Wesley Chapel Water System, Inc
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lee White
Defendant:
Wesley Chapel Water System Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Claiborne Electric Cooperative, Inc
as 5:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lee White
Defendant:
Claiborne Electric Cooperative Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American United Transportation Inc. v. USPS et al
as 1:2024cv03278
Plaintiff:
American United Transportation Inc.
Defendant:
USPS and Willie Lee White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
White v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
David Lee White
Defendant:
Chad Chronister, Valdez M. Nelson Guzman, S. Colin Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE DOCKETED IN 5:24-HC-2042-BO. White
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Melvin Lee White, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White
as 5:2024hc02042
Petitioner:
Melvin Lee White, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Brown et al
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lee White
Defendant:
Mark Brown, Phillip Fincher, Hez Elkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rehms v. Post Falls Police Department, et al.
as 24-701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORRIE M. REHMS, a single person
Defendant / Appellee:
POST FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF POST FALLS, CITY OF COEUR D' ALENE and others
White v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee White
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Ashley Lepold, Dane R. Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
