Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Jones v. San Luis Obispo Superior Court et al
as 2:2011cv02189
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jones
Defendant:
San Luis Obispo Superior Court, California Mens Colony State Prison, Law Offices of Asbaugh & Maguire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Davis
as 1:2011cv02127
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jones and Salih Ahmad
Defendant:
Zenola Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Jone
as 10-1894
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LEONARD JONES, a/k/a Tony, a/k/a Shy, a/k/a Shyheem, a/k/a Anthony James
Pittman et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01282
Plaintiff:
Angela Pittman , Keisha LebLanc , Kevin Ruffin and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY)
as 2:2009cv84644
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE COMPANY, A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), VIACOM INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD JONES, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Airhart et al v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv05477
Plaintiff:
Frank R. Airhart, Frank R. Airhart, Angela Aldridge and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Jones v. Quarterman
as 09-20079
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEONARD JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Jones v. Smith et al
as 3:2008cv00615
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jones
Defendant:
Jim Smith and Debra Lance
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Vincent Jones, Jr.
as 08-4672
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VINCENT LEONARD JONES, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
