Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CHARLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58874
Plaintiff:
LEROY CHARLES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott #158990 v. Rewerts
as 1:2018cv00431
Petitioner:
Leroy Charles Scott #158990
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bonebright et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02273
Plaintiff:
Clair Nelson Bonebright , Douglas Gene Jelsma , Randy D. Willmott and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRETT v. MRS. YA YA et al
as 2:2013cv07394
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
MRS. YA YA, MRS. CLARK, CHARLES BRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2012cv00668
Petitioner:
Leroy Charles Wilson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv03798
Petitioner:
Leroy Charles Wilson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2010cv00505
Plaintiff:
Leroy Charles Owens
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: C. S. Gaidry, Inc., et al
as 10-30100
Petitioner:
In re: C. S. GAIDRY, INC., W. L. GAIDRY, L.L.C., WANDA L. GAIDRY and others
Defendant - Respondent:
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, UNION EXPLORATION PARTNERS LTD, FOREST OIL CORP and others
C.S. Gaidry, Inc. et al v. Union Oil Company of California et al
as 2:2009cv02762
Plaintiff:
C.S. Gaidry, Inc., C.S. Gaidry, Inc., C.S. Gaidry, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Union Oil Company of California, Union Oil Company of California, Union Oil Company of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
