Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McLemore et al v. Marin Housing Authority et al
as 3:2020cv05431
Defendant:
Marin County, Marin Housing Authority Commission, Lewis Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Royce McLemore and DOE Plaintiffs 1-1,500
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis Jordan v. Secretary Pennsylvania Depart, et al
as 19-9002
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEWIS JORDAN, AKA John Lewis
In re: Lewis Jordan
as 19-9001
Not Yet Classified:
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
Robert Jordan v. Michael Hardin
as 14-7838
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LEWIS JORDAN
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL B. HARDIN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jordan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17756
Plaintiff:
Linda Jordan and Lewis Jordan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Hardin et al
as 5:2013hc02196
Petitioner:
Robert Lewis Jordan
Respondent:
Michael Hardin and Attorney General of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JORDAN, et al v. MCKIMMEY, et al
as 1:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN VOGLER JORDAN and ROBERT LEWIS JORDAN
Defendant:
VICKIE MCKIMMEY and AMERICAN FERRET ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Spence v. East Lake Management Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00775
Plaintiff:
Dameon Spence and Dameon Spence
Defendant:
East Lake Management Group, Inc., Gertte Smith, Chicago Housing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
