Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cender v. Meeks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00667
Defendant:
Amy Jones, Linda Benson, Dennis Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Cender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00573
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Linda Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peacock v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Defendant:
James Jackson, Thomas Kincey, Traves Yelder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03304
Plaintiff:
Linda Benson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28903
Plaintiff:
Linda Benson and Morgan Benson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mulvaney v. Meeks et al
as 2:2013cv00677
Plaintiff:
Trista C. Mulvaney
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks , Preston Hughes , Jeffrey Reasons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bedsole v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00613
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bedsole
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Dr. McWatters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Capers v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Curtis Eugene Capers
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Dr. McWolters, Linda Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Meeks et al
as 2:2009cv00654
Plaintiff:
Leonard E. Dorsey
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Captain Huges, Don Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
