Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Harward et al v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillette, David May, Jo Ann Wiersema and others
Defendant:
Austin Community College and City Of Austin
Petitioner:
Mark Mathias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02680
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linda Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02014
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linda Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Maurice Lee v. City of Fayetteville
as 17-1731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MAURICE LEE, by and through his Guardian Linda Shelton
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE and JOHN DOES
Shelton v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2015cv11310
Plaintiff:
Linda Shelton
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelton et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv04116
Plaintiff:
Linda Shelton and Douglas Shelton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oshay Johnson v. CDCR, et al
as 14-16712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSHAY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, BRIAN DUFFY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Johnson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2013cv01730
Plaintiff:
Oshay Johnson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Board of Parole Hearings, Brian Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Rose v. State of California, et al
as 12-15447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN W. ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, LINDA SHELTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
