Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Vecchio et al v. Taylor et al
as 3:2017cv01502
Plaintiff:
Sol David Vecchio, Josh D. Kukuk, Tyler C. Lane and others
Defendant:
Patricia Taylor, Ben Hall McFarlin, Jr., Barry R. Tidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Liang et al
as 2:2017mc50336
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Robert Liang , Richard Dorenkamp, Heinz-Jakob Neusser and others
Objector:
Dinah Abbott , Timothy Abell , Bethany Adkins and others
Bell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16528
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13174
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Tunica Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bell
Defendant:
Tunica Restaurant Group, Inc. and Richard Abadisians
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-15822
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bell and Loran Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Bell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv15822
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bell and Loran Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patrick Christian v. Rodney Moore
as 13-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY MOORE, DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., JAMES TOWNSEND and others
Christian v. Moore et al
as 3:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Christian
Defendant:
Rodney Moore, Daniel E. Bailey, Jr., James Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Belle v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations
as 1:2013cv00862
Plaintiff:
Lisa Belle
Defendant:
New Jersey Transit Rail Operations
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
