Cases 1 - 10 of 13
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 2219 et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 2219, Jeffery Brown, James Bunch and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, USA, Lloyd Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Carter v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03966
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis Hohol v. Michael Meisner, et al
as 14-1738
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS L. HOHOL
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MEISNER and LLOYD CARTER
Hohol, Dennis v. Dittman, Michael et al
as 3:2014cv00081
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Hohol
Respondent:
Michael Dittman and Lloyd Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hohol v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2009cv01105
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Hohol
Respondent:
Larry L Jenkins and Lloyd Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. CSX Transportation Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02185
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Carter
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc., CSX Transportation Inc., Consolidated Rail Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
CARTER v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. et al
as 2:2008cv03745
Plaintiff:
LLOYD CARTER
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. and CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lloyd Carter, Jr v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
as PAE/2:08-CV-69178
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Carter, Jr
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
