Cases 1 - 10 of 1,084
TRIANGLE FASTENER CORPORATION v. CONNECTIVE SYSTEMS & SUPPLY, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Triangle Fastener Corporation
Defendant:
Connective Systems & Supply, Inc., Aaron Berger and Scott Lovell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brown v. Lange
as 6:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Quinten Lovell Brown
Defendant:
Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bechel et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Bechel, Marcia Hickson, Raven El and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Caldwell v. Ryan et al
as 1:2024cv11178
Plaintiff:
Ramon Lovell Caldwell
Defendant:
Ryan, Mikat, Moriarty and others
Bryan Pollion v. Timothy Adesanya
as 24-1607
Plaintiff:
BRYAN LOVELL POLLION
Defendant:
TIMOTHY ADESANYA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lovell v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Lovell, II
Defendant:
Deputy Sanchez and Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schilthuis v. Schilthuis et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Defendant:
Big Horn County Commissioner, Big Horn County Sheriff, Big Horn County Prosecuting Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Schilthuis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
