Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00759
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01937
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01024
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01227
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01322
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morgan v. Montou
as 2:2026cv01169
Defendant:
Jean-Luc Montou
Plaintiff:
Darren James Morgan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dely v. Davis et al
as 2:2026cv00902
Plaintiff:
Edner Dely
Defendant:
Sinclair Davis and Luc Pierre-Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kondos v. Yaya et al
as 9:2026cv80330
Plaintiff:
Raymonda Kondos
Defendant:
Luc Yaya and Van Ness Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kondos v. Yaya et al
as 9:2026cv80332
Plaintiff:
Raymonda Kondos
Defendant:
Van Ness Pharmacy, LLC and Luc H. Yaya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Calvin Stevens v. County of Mercer, et al
as 26-1352
Plaintiff:
CALVIN T. STEVENS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, Individual and Official Capacity, BRIAN HUGHES, Mercer County Executive Individual and Official Capacities, COMMISSIONER NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Individual and Official Capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
