Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Clear With Computers LLC v. Lufkin Industries Inc
as 6:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
Clear With Computers LLC
Defendant:
Lufkin Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Moody v. Midwest Logistics LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00091
Plaintiff:
Rene Moody
Defendant:
Midwest Logistics LLC , Overland Transport Inc , Ronald Vanduzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Peugh v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Marcus Peugh
Defendant:
Lufkin Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Ken Nolen, et al v. Lufkin Industries Inc, et al
as 11-50524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEN NOLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
LUFKIN INDUSTRIES INC, ANDREWS KURTH LLP and GARY LEON BUSH
Lufkin Industries Inc v. Weatherford International Ltd
as 6:2011cv00299
Plaintiff:
Lufkin Industries Inc
Defendant:
Weatherford International Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TYNDALL et al v. WILLIS et al
as 2:2010cv67428
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER H WILLIS, ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, INGERSOLL RAND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JOYCE CARAWAN and JAMMIE C TYNDALL
Respondent:
D.O. ALVIN SCHONFELD
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Nolen et al v. Lufkin Industries, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Michael Shayne Birkla, Jeffrey DaCunha, Brian Delozier and others
Defendant:
Gary L. Bush, Andrews Kurth, LLP and Lufkin Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
SunTrust Bank v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
SunTrust Bank
Defendant:
Lufkin Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tyndall et al v. Willis et al
as 2:2010cv00343
Defendant:
Patricia, Willis Barge Lines Inc, Caterpillar Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jammie C Tyndall and Joyce Carawan
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
