Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Taylor v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv12228
Plaintiff:
Lynn Taylor
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
Victoria Lynne Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Lynn Taylor v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-11287
Petitioner - Appellant:
LYNN TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Glenn v. WhiteHall et al
as 3:2014cv03691
Plaintiff:
Andres Leroy Glenn
Defendant:
Barber WhiteHall, Versse, Lynn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Brown v. Denita Wright, et al
as 14-2757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth E. Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Denita Wright, Parole Officer and Lynne Taylor, Records Supervisor
Taylor et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as IAN/5:14-cv-04062
Plaintiff:
Kristi Lynn Taylor and Paul Taylor
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson , Ethicon, Inc and GyneCare
Taylor et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv04062
Plaintiff:
Kristi Lynn Taylor and Paul Taylor
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson, Ethicon, Inc and GyneCare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06734
Plaintiff:
Sue Lynn Taylor
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03867
Plaintiff:
Linda Taylor and Richard Lynn Taylor
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05856
Plaintiff:
DONNA ALLEN , ERIC BAKER , MARY BATTLE and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
