Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Brandon v. Department of Corrections of the State of Washington, et al.
as 23-4333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON G. BRANDON
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, JOHN L. CAMPBELL and others
Elliott v. Conner et al
as 3:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Keisean Elliott
Defendant:
Deputy M. Conner, Deputy Sgt. (f/n/u) Gray and Williamson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01614
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. CONNER, III
Defendant:
WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CONNER v. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv03273
Plaintiff:
James M Conner and JAMES M. CONNER, III
Defendant:
WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Conner v. Sheriff of Warren County Indiana
as 4:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
Gary M Conner and Gary Michael Conner
Respondent:
Sheriff of Warren County Indiana and Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. State of Indiana et al
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Gary M Conner
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Bill Brooks, Don Munson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CONNER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv01933
Plaintiff:
GARY M. CONNER
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, BILL BROOKS, DON MUNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
