Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Midland National Life Insurance Company v. Dumas et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Midland National Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Christine M. Dumas and Lynda M. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Stewart et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
James Stewart, Curtis James Walker, Corey Michael Walker and others
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation n/k/a Amtrak, Jennifer M. Harvey and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 rs Fed. Question: Federal Rail Safety Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harvey v. Rillema
as 3:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Beau M. Harvey and Beaureard M. Harvey
Defendant:
Kurt Rillema
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harvey v. Franklin County, OH et al
as 2:2022cv03886
Plaintiff:
Nichelle M Harvey
Defendant:
Franklin County, OH, State of Ohio, Bradley P. Toman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harvey v. Bristol, Jr.
as 1:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Katherine M Harvey
Defendant:
Richard E Bristol, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
HARVEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39114
Plaintiff:
JOHN M HARVEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Macon County Jail
as 2:2021cv02088
Plaintiff:
Khristian Scott
Defendant:
Macon County Jail, B Evenson and M Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. John Henoud
as 20-7825
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN MAURICE HENOUD, a/k/a John Harvey, a/k/a J. M. Harvey, a/k/a J. M. Hardey, a/k/a Jerry Geohn Davidson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
