Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Barnes v. Jarrett et al
as 4:2026cv00372
Petitioner:
Jamar Deontae Barnes
Respondent:
J Jarrett and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Reid (Trent)
as 26-1998
Defendant:
DESHAWN THOMAS, DWIGHT REID, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roker v. Jupiter Medical Center, Inc.
as 4:2026cv00621
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Roker
Defendant:
Jupiter Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
WILLIAMS v. FRIZZLE et al
as 3:2026cv04712
Plaintiff:
JARRETT ARMOND WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AMY FRIZZLE and GARY WIEBORG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turnbo et al v. City of Decatur, Illinois et al
as 2:2026cv02206
Plaintiff:
Taveyan Antonio Turnbo and Shataya Jackson
Defendant:
City of Decatur, Illinois, Macon County, Illinois, Precious Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
COSEY et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2026cv02214
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO COSEY and RICHONDA JARRETT
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 01DCC2439 WMATA (court jurisdiction)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hembree v. Carr et al
as 6:2026cv00194
Plaintiff:
Larry Walter Hembree
Defendant:
Jarrett Carr, Christopher Brown, Zach Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
