Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Andricci v. Ramsey et al
as 7:2015cv03367
Plaintiff:
Adam J. Andricci
Defendant:
Clayton M. Ramsey , John Doe I-X and ABC Corp. I-X,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramsey et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02726
Plaintiff:
Carter M. Ramsey, Jr. and Joyce Ramsey
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramsey v. Parnell
as 2:2014cv00186
Petitioner:
Sheri M Ramsey
Respondent:
Jane Parnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Krause et al v. Ramsey MD PC et al
as 2:2013cv00345
Plaintiff:
Kacie Krause and Marcus Harvey
Defendant:
Keith M Ramsey MD PC, Keith M Ramsey Medical Corp, Northshore Community Health Centers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mekal et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as ILS/3:13-cv-00683
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mekal , Curtis Melton , Yanbin Men and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Mekal et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00683
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mekal , Curtis Melton , Yanbin Men and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
William Roddy, et al v. City of Huntsville, Alabama, et al
as 13-12826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. RODDY and WENDY SUE RODDY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA, TERRY LUCAS and JASON M. RAMSEY
:
SERVICE
Ramsey v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03075
Plaintiff:
Karen M. Ramsey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronald Anderson et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05037
Plaintiff:
Ralph Acle, Joseph L. Adams, Justine T. Alacar and others
Defendant:
Does and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Ramsey v. Capital Fitness, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00641
Plaintiff:
David M Ramsey
Defendant:
Capital Fitness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
