Cases 1 - 10 of 43
(PC) Colbourn v. Draper et al
as 2:2023cv02918
Plaintiff:
Orrin Tyler Colbourn
Defendant:
B. Draper, Z. Tarris, Darnelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neubel et al v. Hamilton County Hospital Authority et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Juanita Neubel and Michelle Neubel
Defendant:
Hamilton County Hospital Authority doing business as Erlanger Health System, Ryan Y Lam, Kelly M Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Cogdell v. Fowler et al
as 3:2021cv00960
Plaintiff:
Cogdell Carlos and Carlos Cogdell
Defendant:
Sgt. Jeremy Fowler, Sgt. B. Songbird and Lt. M. Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paris v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02149
Defendant:
Joann K. Benway, Editha M. Stokes, Heather L. Spengler and others
Plaintiff:
John Paris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv11826
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTRINA M STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70822
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTRINA M STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes v. Warden Fikes
as 2:2019cv00433
Petitioner:
Mario M Stokes
Respondent:
Warden Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stokes v. Cory et al
as 2:2019cv00604
Defendant:
Cory, Erica Carter, Virginia Penninsula Regional Jail Authority and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
