Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
SABRINA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, JUDGE THERESA A. BISENIUS, JUDGE JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK and others
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv10080
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M Williams and Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Judge Theresa Bisenius, Judge Jennifer Ulwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Howard v. Bisenius et al
as 1:2023cv12176
Plaintiff:
David Howard
Defendant:
Theresa A Bisenius, Jennifer M Ulwick, Mary Rudolph Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marynowski v. Brady et al
as 1:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
STANLEY MARYNOWSKI
Defendant:
Thomas M. Brady and Lloyd J. Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MARYNOWSKI v. BRADY et al
as 3:2023cv09113
Plaintiff:
STANLEY MARYNOWSKI
Defendant:
THOMAS M BRADY and LLOYD J AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brunson v. Adams, et al
as 23-4042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOY ARLAN BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA S. ADAMS, PETE AGUILAR, COLIN Z. ALLRED and others
Brady v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Harley M Brady
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffries, DeeDee Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisa Brady v. Davita, Inc.
as 22-3905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA M. BRADY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVITA, INC.
Lewis v. McCabe, Weisberg, Conway LLC et al
as 8:2022cv02188
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lewis
Defendant:
McCabe, Weisberg, Conway LLC, Laura H.G. O'Sullivan, Esq, Erin M. Brady, Esq and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
