Cases 31 - 40 of 196
Bryant v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02235
Plaintiff:
Christine M. Bryant
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
David Meyers v. Captain Boxer
as 22-6359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN BOXER, LIEUTENANT MOSLEY, A. DAVID ROBINSON and others
Cardenas Olmos v. Hand et al
as 3:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Estela Guadalupe Cardenas Olmos
Defendant:
Sherry A Hand, A Symmetry Company International LLC, Titan Black LLC doing business as Astute Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
MYNATT v. REAGLE, et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ERIC HOLCOMB, ROBERT CARTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Clarke et al
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kilolo Kilajazi, Andrew Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2021cv02840
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, A. SMITH, M. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sito Pantoja, et al v. Robert Martinez, et al
as 21-7118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sito Pantoja, Maria Tusa and Edmund A. Walsh, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Martinez, Dora Cervantes, Gary R. Allen and others
ROLLINGS FUNERAL SERVICE INC v. BRYANT FUNERAL HOME et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
ROLLINGS FUNERAL SERVICE INC
Defendant:
BRYANT FUNERAL HOME LLC and HARRY M BRYANT
PANTOJA et al v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2021cv02197
Plaintiff:
SITO PANTOJA, MARIA TUSA, EDMUND A WALSH and others
Defendant:
ROBERT MARTINEZ, DORA CERVANTES, GARY R. ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Felton v. Hudson et al
as 1:2021cv01038
Plaintiff:
Clayton Lee Felton
Defendant:
D. Hudson, T. Johnson and M. Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
