Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Peacock v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Defendant:
James Jackson, Thomas Kincey, Traves Yelder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaCount v. Spalding County Juvenile Court et al
as 3:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Joseph LaCount
Defendant:
Spalding County Juvenile Court, Spalding County Dept. of Family & Children Services, Karen M. Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LACOUNT v. ROUNDTREE et al
as 5:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HOLLAND LACOUNT
Defendant:
DAWN ROUNDTREE, PHYLLIS EASTON-BARKLEY, TAMMY GRINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LACOUNT v. ROUNDTREE et al
as 3:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HOLLAND LACOUNT
Defendant:
DAWN ROUNDTREE, PHYLLIS EASTON-BARKLEY, TAMMY GRINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Calloway et al
as 3:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Frances M. Calloway, Norma J. Campbell, Mary C. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Calloway et al
as 2:2014cv02304
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Callen C. Calloway, Syndie M. Calloway, Kansas Housing Resources Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Stevens v. Downey et al
as 2:2014cv02030
Plaintiff:
DeEric M Stevens
Defendant:
Michael D Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew, . Tutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Calloway v. Sumter County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Stevie M Calloway
Defendant:
Sumter County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
