Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ratliff v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00431
Plaintiff: Tina M. Ratliff
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Huerta v. Ratliff et al
as 3:2021cv00209
Plaintiff: Rey Jesus Huerta
Defendant: Willie M Ratliff and Moises Villalobos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Young et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00382
Respondent: D. L. Young, M. Ratliff, Mr. Hedrick and others
Petitioner: Lorenzo Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kerwin Woodard v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 19-40178
Defendant / Appellee: JERRY J. SANCHEZ, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Executive Director, I. AROVEHUN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: KERWIN WOODARD
Pollard v. City of Muskegon Heights et al
as 1:2018cv00404
Plaintiff: Darryle Pollard
Defendant: Muskegon Heights, City of , Brandon M. Dekuiper , Michael T. Edens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. Livingston et al.
as 3:2017cv00113
Plaintiff: Kerwin Woodard
Defendant: Brad Livingston, Mark Jones, Charlesanne E Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. Livingston et al. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 4:2017cv00833
Plaintiff: Kerwin Woodard
Defendant: Brad Livingston, Mark Jones, Charlesanne E Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Denheim et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00257
Plaintiff: Samuel Richard Walker
Defendant: James W Denheim, Greta Bennett, Tiffeni Y Lacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE v. RATLIFF
as 1:2015cv00157
Petitioner: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Respondent: COLEN M RATLIFF, JR
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?