Prison Condition Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Smith v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: Courtney M. Smith
Defendant: David Jones, David Martinez, Leroy D. Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonio Smith v. Christopher Stevens
as 23-3236
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONIO M. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: CHRISTOPHER STEVENS
Bashum v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv03314
Plaintiff: Bernard Bashum
Defendant: Keenan M Smith, Brittany Greene, Kimberly Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtiss v. Lanuza et al
as 1:2023cv15035
Plaintiff: Daniel Curtiss
Defendant: Lanuza, M Smith, D. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STERLING v. ALLEN et al
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff: DEVON STERLING
Defendant: C. ALLEN, L. HAVILAND, M. SMITH, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Ruth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00592
Plaintiff: Frederick J Barton
Defendant: Ruth, Young, M Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. BURCHAM et al
as 2:2022cv00471
Plaintiff: DAUSHAWN LEE
Defendant: BURCHAM, M. SMITH, C. SIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Smith v. John Kind, et al
as 22-2870
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONIO M. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN KIND, JAY VAN LANEN, TIMOTHY RETZLAFF and others
DUDLEY v. PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC, ET AL
as 3:2022cv00170
Plaintiff: CLINTON DEONARD DUDLEY
Defendant: PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC), CONSELOR SMICK, CONSELOR FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Craven County et al
as 5:2022ct03360
Plaintiff: Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant: Craven County, Jones County, City of New Bern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?