Cases 31 - 40 of 549
Lundahl v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv01017
Petitioner:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent:
M. Smith, Merrick Garland, Collete Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thornton-Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv01790
Plaintiff:
DeJuan B. Thornton-Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden D. Christensen, C.O. B. Fogleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Potter v. Lett et al
as 4:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Jason M Potter
Defendant:
Stacey Lett, Michael Barrett, Alan D Pratzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. BURCHAM et al
as 2:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
DAUSHAWN LEE
Defendant:
BURCHAM, M. SMITH, C. SIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Malcolm
as 1:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Dontae M Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Malcolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Smith v. John Kind, et al
as 22-2870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO M. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN KIND, JAY VAN LANEN, TIMOTHY RETZLAFF and others
Dunn v. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv03245
Plaintiff:
Drake A. Dunn
Defendant:
Eric N. Williams, (fnu) Kurr, Jason Reser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00438
Petitioner:
BRENNEN M. SMITH
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DUDLEY v. PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC, ET AL
as 3:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
CLINTON DEONARD DUDLEY
Defendant:
PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC), CONSELOR SMICK, CONSELOR FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Craven County et al
as 5:2022ct03360
Plaintiff:
Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant:
Craven County, Jones County, City of New Bern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
