Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Neuhoff v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Colecius Neuhoff
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ferguson v. Blackmon et al
as 7:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Lamont Ferguson
Defendant:
Lt. Blackmon, M.J. Gilcrest, Jason Rason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowder v. Bayless
as 3:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Danny B. Crowder, Jr.
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stockwell et al v. Choice Hotels (Barbados 2), et al
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW STOCKWELL and ALISON MACDONALD
Defendant:
CHOICE HOTELS (BARBADOS 2),, M.J. Fells Point, L.L.C., M.J. Fells Point SPE, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
PERARA v. SIZEMORE et al
as 1:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Robert Henry Perara and ROBERT HENRY PERARA, JR.
Defendant:
Officer M J. Sizemore, HIGH POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER M.J. SIZEMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00314
Petitioner:
Phillip A. Garza
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00246
Petitioner:
Timothy E. Walker
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Venneri v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Anthony Venneri
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bartusek v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00222
Petitioner:
Michael Bartusek
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Hall et al
as 5:2022ct03249
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Jones
Defendant:
Patrick Hall and M.J. Fetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
