Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gerry Moore v. Jessica Wallace, et al
as 26-4036
Defendant:
KRISTIN R. PALMER, STEVEN L. TAYLOR, MICHAEL JASON HENDERSHOT and others
Plaintiff:
GERRY L. MOORE
Trammell v. Barksdale
as 6:2026cv05538
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Barksdale
Plaintiff:
Jerry Duane Trammell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
David Meyers v. Robert Ballou
as 26-7186
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE ELIZABETH K. DILLON, Chief Judge, U.S. JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON, U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Donald Trump
as 26-2614
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON, U.S. JUDGE E. DILLON and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Wiley v. Barbrey et al
as 5:2026ct03336
Defendant:
Detective M. Mundy, Lt. J. Vaughan, Magistrate S. Harrell and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antwan Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Grisanti
as 26-3144
Defendant:
AMHERST POLICE DEPARTMENT, GULUN NAHAR SHALY, MOHI AHMED and others
Plaintiff:
LYDIA DIANE JONES, as Administrator of the Estate of James Jones
CLARK v. CITY OF COLUMBUS et al
as 2:2026cv01565
Defendant:
LAKISHA JEFFERSON, Keith Moore, Enoch White and others
Plaintiff:
April Clark, r
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shariff v. Cain et al
as 1:2026cv00323
Plaintiff:
Abdul Al-Mumit Asad Shariff
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Cono Coranna, Joel Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrill Goods, Sr. v. USA, et al
as 26-5932
Plaintiff:
TERRILL GOODS, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHIEF JUDGE DAVID L. BUNNING and MAGISTRATE JUDGE CANDACE J. SMITH
Adeleke V. Lindsay et al
as 3:2026cv03619
Plaintiff:
Olumuyiwa A Adeleke
Defendant:
District Judge Sam Lindsay, Bank of America, District Judge David Godbey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
