Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Manship v. Feldman et al
as 3:2018cv00802
Defendant:
Steve Taylor, Nicole Braginton, Wayne Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
James Renwick Manship, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Copeland v. McGhee et al
as 5:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Michael P McGhee, David T McGhee, Betty Jo McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Manship v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv05153
Plaintiff:
Robert Manship
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Manship v. Virginia Board of Elections et al
as 3:2016cv00884
Plaintiff:
James Renwick Manship
Defendant:
James B. Alcorn, Clara Belle Wheeler, Singleton McAllister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manship v. Cook Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv19013
Plaintiff:
Florene Manship
Defendant:
Cook Group, Inc., Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
J.R. Manship v. State Board of Elections of VA
as 13-1006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. R. MANSHIP, a/k/a States, as a Disabled Veteran
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF VIRGINIA, CHARLIE JUDD, Chairman, KIMBERLY BOWERS, Vice Chairman and others
Manship v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al
as 3:2012cv00891
Plaintiff:
J. R. Manship
Defendant:
State Board of Elections of Virginia, Charlie Judd, Kimberly Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manship v. Brothers et al
as 1:2011cv01003
Plaintiff:
James Renwick Manship
Defendant:
Sherri Brothers, Marita Y. Wilson, Tammee Gaymon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
