Cases 1 - 10 of 23
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv10638
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv00590
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
TURNER v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv00541
Plaintiff:
JUAN IBN-DON MUMIT TURNER
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, MARCIA M. WALDRON and DORAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Darby v. Theodore McKee, et al
as 16-4102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. DARBY
Defendant - Appellee:
THEODORE A. MCKEE, THOMAS I. VANASKIE, D. MICHAEL FISHER and others
DARBY v. MCKEE et al
as 2:2016cv05246
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. DARBY
Defendant:
THEODORE A. MCKEE, THOMAS I. VANASKIE, D. MICHAEL FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Michael Piskanin, Jr.
as 14-8063
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Respondent:
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN and MARCIA M. WALDRON
XU v. WALDRON
as 3:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
HUAFENG XU
Defendant:
MARCIA M. WALDRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: William Rohland
as 13-3649
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM ROHLAND
Defendant - Respondent:
DEPUTY SUPER. M. WENEROWICZ and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
MARCIA M. WALDRON
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Rya Zobel
as 12-2546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Defendant - Appellee:
RYA W. ZOBEL, Judge, Individual and Official Capacities, LEO T. SOROKIN, Magistrate Judge, in Official Capacity, TWO UNKNOWN UNITED STATES MARSHALS, in Official Capacity and others
Azubuko v. Zobel et al
as 1:2012cv00871
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Defendant:
Rya W. Zobel, Leo T Sorokin, Two Unknown United States' Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
