Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Carr v. Kabara et al
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
Pollyanna Kabara, Biji Joseph, Kathleen Woeste and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BEASLEY et al
as 6:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JEROME JACKSON and Marcus Jackson
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, M.D. John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Shelley et al
as 9:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jackson
Defendant:
Toby Shelley, William Fitzpatrick, Marc A. Rothschild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Fertitta Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
FATARA MUHAMMAD, Curtis Jamison, Kenneth Douglas and others
Defendant:
FERTITTA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., LANDRY'S INC., MCCORMICK & SCHMICK RESTAURANT CORP., d/b/a MASTRO'S STEAKHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Jackson v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2022cv03946
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jackson
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. State of Georgia
as 1:2022cv03619
Petitioner:
Marcus Jackson
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Marcus Jackson
as 22-6323
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS JACKSON
US v. Marcus Jackson
as 22-6324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS JACKSON
JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02118
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JACKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, Aero Holding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
