Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Morgan v. Wamp
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Charles Van Morgan
Defendant:
Coty Wamp, Scott Allen, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Wamp
as 3:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Charles Van Morgan
Defendant:
Coty Wamp, Scott Allen, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bender v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 1:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
Mark Bender
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Mark Bender, Sr. v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2021cv01006
Plaintiff:
Mark Bender, Sr.
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Bender, Sr. v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 2:2021cv04880
Plaintiff:
Mark Bender, Sr.
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Harvey v. TN, et al
as 19-6434
Defendant / Appellee:
INVESTIGATOR JOHN DOE #2, Chattanooga Police Department, OFFICER [UNKNOWN] WISE, Badge # 1690, OFFICER JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD CHARLES HARVEY
Harvey v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv00297
Petitioner:
Reginald Charles Harvey
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Mark Bender, P Ego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Webb v. Mark Bender, et al
as 17-2888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK BENDER, NEIL J. MARTIN and KIMBERLY A. HOBSON
WEBB v. BENDER et al
as 2:2016cv00352
Defendant:
MARK BENDER, KIMBERLY A. HOBSON and NEIL J. MARTIN
Plaintiff:
JAMES WEBB
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv09326
Plaintiff:
Christina Bender and Mark Bender
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
