Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00185
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harper v. Davis et al
as 1:2026cv04474
Plaintiff:
Jahmal Harper
Defendant:
Toney Markey Davis, Jr. and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White v. U.S. Marshals Service
as 3:2026cv00456
Petitioner:
Markey Antwan White
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02091
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Markey v. Nationstar Mortgage
as 1:2026cv02203
Plaintiff:
Stephanie J Markey
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage doing business as Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Real Property
Engvall et al v. Wheeler
as 1:2026cv01954
Plaintiff:
Emelie Engvall and Ryan Markey
Defendant:
Scott Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pidge v. Healey, et al
as 26-8025
Petitioner:
JANET J. PIDGE
Respondent:
ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, LEAH BELAIRE FOLEY, RACHAEL SPLAINE ROLLINS, General Counsel, Roxbury Communty College and others
Henry v. Markey et al
as 1:2025cv07240
Plaintiff:
Toriano Henry
Defendant:
Officer M. E. Markey and City of Sandy Springs, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Smith et al
as 4:2025cv04221
Plaintiff:
Steven A Bell
Defendant:
Joshua Smith, Kelly VanFleet, Rhea Flambeau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
