Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Holloway v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2020cv00129
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, ABC Corps #1-3 and John Does #1-3
Plaintiff:
Mary Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holloway v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv14118
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Hospira, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holloway v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03637
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marie Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 md
Dyjak v. Piephoff et al
as 3:2018cv02049
Defendant:
Tonya Piephoff, Dr. Gavali, Sarah Brown-Foiles and others
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15751
Plaintiff:
Mary Holloway
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holloway v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 3:2014cv50092
Plaintiff:
Mary Holloway
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holloway v. City of Rochester
as 13-3724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Holloway
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Rochester and Officer David Joseph
Bloodworth v. Sheldon et al
as 3:2013cv01382
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bloodworth
Defendant:
Edward T. Sheldon, Tara Pinski, Susan R. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2010cv06470
Plaintiff:
Mary Holloway
Defendant:
City of Rochester and David Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESARO et al v. ASTELLAS US LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01979
Plaintiff:
ANDREA DESARO , AMY WEBER and PAMELA CURLEY
Defendant:
ASTELLAS US LLC, ASTELLAS PHARMA US INC., KELLI BUFFINGTON CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
